Here is a detailed curriculum of your learning plan for MySQL’s storage engines
Thank you for reading this article. More Interview Questions here:
https://programmerscareer.com/software-interview-set/
Topic: 1.1 Introduction to MySQL Storage Engines
In MySQL, a storage engine is the underlying software component that a database management system uses to create, read, update and delete (CRUD) the data. Simply put, it’s responsible for the management of information within a database. You can think of it being analogous to how a filesystem manages files on a disk.
Each table in a MySQL database is created with a particular storage engine. MySQL provides several storage engines such as InnoDB, MyISAM, MEMORY, and others as well that allow us to choose a one that is best fit for our requirements.
When interacting with a database, we largely don’t have to be concerned about storage engines — we can just focus on writing SQL queries. But the choice of a storage engine has an impact on various characteristics of how a database functions such as:
- Transaction support: Transaction allows several modifications in a database to be processed as one unit of work, either all data modifications made within a transaction are committed to the database, or none of them are. InnoDB supports transaction, MyISAM does not.
- Locking levels: Locking prevents multiple processes from interfering with each other’s activities. Different storage engines employ different locking mechanisms ranging from row-level to table-level locking.
- Data durability and crash recovery: This is the ability of a database to recover from a crash or power loss. InnoDB has strong data durability and crash recovery capabilities.
A question you might be asking: Can I use multiple storage engines in a single database? Yes! In fact, each table can use a different storage engine.
Topic: 1.2 Understanding the InnoDB Engine
InnoDB is the default storage engine for MySQL. It provides the standard ACID-compliant transaction features, along with row-level locking and foreign key relationships. These are a few of the reasons why it’s heavily favored in scenarios where data integrity and performance are crucial.
Now let’s break down and understand these features:
- ACID Compliance: The ACID properties (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) are the key transaction processing concepts. They maintain data integrity over multiple transactions, thereby ensuring that your data remains consistent and reliable throughout and after all operations.
- Row-level locking: As opposed to table-level locking (as in MyISAM), InnoDB employs row-level locking where each row modified in the process of a transaction locks that specific row and allows other transactions to modify other rows.
- Foreign Key Relationships: Foreign keys enforce referential integrity among tables in a database. In other words, it helps prevent actions that would destroy links between tables.
InnoDB also has crash recovery capabilities. This means that InnoDB can auto-correct any inconsistencies that occur as a result of premature shutdown or major failure by replaying its logs.
In terms of performance, InnoDB uses a method known as Multiversion Concurrency Control (MVCC) to get past the need for read locks when executing SELECT statements. This is a significant benefit if you have a busy site where SELECT statements are common and data integrity is crucial.
Topic: 1.3 Understanding the MyISAM Engine
The MyISAM engine is one of the earliest storage engines in MySQL, and before MySQL version 5.5, MyISAM was the default storage engine. There are some distinguishing features and uses of MyISAM that make it efficient in specific scenarios.
MyISAM does full table-level locking for INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE operations. What does this really mean? Well, when a row is being written or updated, the entire table which the row is part of, is locked, and no other operations can write to the same table until the write or update process is completed.
One might see this as a disadvantage compared to the row-level locking that InnoDB offers; however, there are specific cases when table-level locking works perfectly. Those are the scenarios where read operations vastly outnumber the writes, such as in a blog or a website where most of the time you retrieve data to display and updates to data are infrequent.
Another key feature of MyISAM is that it supports Full-Text Search indexes, allowing for natural language searching within character fields. Although InnoDB also supports this feature now, MyISAM was the primary choice for Full-Text Search for a long time.
However, the MyISAM engine does not support transactions and foreign key constraints, which might be significant downsides for certain applications. Furthermore, it lacks crash recovery, so a crash can result in data loss or data corruption in a MyISAM table.
Topic: 1.4 Other MySQL Storage Engines
In addition to InnoDB and MyISAM, MySQL provides other storage engines, each with their strengths and optimal use-cases. Let’s get to know them a bit better:
- MEMORY Engine: As the name suggests, this engine keeps all data in memory, offering extremely fast data access times. But remember, data stored in a table using the MEMORY engine will be lost when the server shuts down or crashes. It’s excellent for storing session or temporary data.
- CSV Engine: This engine allows you to access the data in comma-separated values (CSV) format. You can even view and edit data in the table using any text editor. It doesn’t support indexes, so every row search is a full table scan.
- ARCHIVE Engine: If you need to store large amounts of unindexed data, like logs, this is the engine for you. It uses compression to save space and stores data in a way that is easy to back up and transport. While the ARCHIVE engine allows simple SELECT and INSERT statements, it does not support transactions or the ability to delete or update a record.
- BLACKHOLE Engine: The Blackhole engine accepts data but throws it away and does not store it. You might wonder why it’s useful? The Blackhole engine can be used for replicating to more than one slave, and is also used for audit logging on a database server.
- FEDERATED Engine: The Federated Storage Engine allows you to access tables located on other databases on other servers. It provides the ability to create one logical database from many physical servers.
Each of these engines has unique capabilities and fits different scenarios depending on the requirements. That’s the beauty of MySQL’s pluggable storage engine architecture — you can choose the one that serves your needs the best.
Topic: 1.5 Comparison of Storage Engines
MySQL’s versatile set of storage engines, each with their unique feature set, make it an adaptable choice for a vast array of workloads. Now, we will contrast these storage engines, exploring their strengths and weaknesses, and suggesting best-fit contexts.
- InnoDB vs. MyISAM: InnoDB outshines MyISAM when your workload relies heavily on writing operations or requires transactions, as it provides ACID-compliant transaction features, row-level locking and crash recovery. On the contrary, MyISAM could be a sensible choice when the workload is read-intensive, and the durability or atomicity of the transactions is not a deal-breaker.
- InnoDB/MYISAM vs. MEMORY: The MEMORY storage engine, delivering lightning-fast data access by holding all data in memory, is a good fit for storing temporary or session data. But unlike InnoDB and MyISAM, all data is lost when the server shuts down or crashes.
- InnoDB/MYISAM/MEMORY vs. CSV: The CSV engine makes data handling more manageable and flexible by allowing data edit in any text editor. However, it lacks indexing, resulting in full table scans for each row search, and thus might not be performant for large workloads.
- InnoDB/MYISAM/MEMORY/CSV vs. ARCHIVE: When it comes to storing large amounts of rarely-referenced data, like logs or historical transactions, the ARCHIVE engine excels by saving storage space through compression.
- InnoDB/MYISAM/MEMORY/CSV/ARCHIVE vs. BLACKHOLE and FEDERATED: These two engines are quite niched compared to the others: BLACKHOLE can be helpful for tasks like audit logging or multi-slave replication, while FEDERATED can help create a logically single database from various physical servers.
Remember, choosing the right storage engine largely depends on your specific workload and application requirements.
Topic: 1.6 Choosing the Right Storage Engine
Selecting the right storage engine is a crucial decision when setting up your MySQL database because it can significantly impact your application’s performance and reliability. Here are some factors to consider when making your choice:
- Data Integrity: If your application demands high data integrity where transactions need to be atomic (all-or-nothing), you should consider using the InnoDB storage engine which supports ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties.
- Full-text Search: If you plan to run full-text search queries, both MyISAM and InnoDB support this but with varying features. You’ll have to individually explore these features to make sure they fit your use case.
- Memory Usage: If you need maximum read/write speed and the data you’re working with is temporary (like session data), the MEMORY storage engine, which stores all data in memory, could be the ideal fit for you.
- Large Amounts of Data: For handling large amounts of seldom-referenced or historical data, consider the ARCHIVE engine which compresses the data for efficient storage.
- Number of Reads/Writes: Evaluate your application’s read-to-write operation ratio. If the number of read operations significantly exceeds write operations, you may benefit from the MyISAM engine. Conversely, InnoDB is more suitable for write-heavy applications.
- Server Failures: Consideration for what happens during a crash is crucial. If durability is essential for your application, InnoDB should be your choice since it can recover from a crash using transaction logs. On the other hand, MyISAM doesn’t guarantee data durability in case of a crash.
Remember, there is no one-size-fits-all engine, and you might end up using different storage engines for different tables within the same application according to your precise needs.
Topic: 1.7 Review and Assessments
Over our last few lessons, we’ve taken an in-depth tour of MySQL’s various storage engines, understanding their unique features, and compared them based on certain criteria. We have:
- Defined what storage engines are and their role in MySQL.
- Grasped the features and advantages of the InnoDB and MyISAM engines.
- Explored other MySQL storage engines like MEMORY, CSV, ARCHIVE, and more.
- Made a comparison of these storage engines to understand their best use-cases.
- Discussed the factors to consider when choosing the right storage engine for your database.
Let’s test out your understanding before we conclude this series:
- Question 1: What distinguishes InnoDB from MyISAM, and when might you prefer to use one over the other?
- Question 2: Describe a situation where you would benefit from using the MEMORY engine.
- Question 3: If you had a requirement for storing large amounts of log data, which storage engine would you choose, and why?
- Question 4: Name a few factors you’d consider when choosing a storage engine for your database.
Please respond to these questions one by one.
Answer 1: InnoDB is a storage engine that offers features like ACID-compliant transaction support, row-level locking, and crash recovery. This makes it suitable for write-heavy applications or scenarios that require high data integrity. On the other hand, MyISAM is often used for read-heavy applications because it has faster read capabilities. However, it lacks transaction support and crash safety features.
Answer 2: The MEMORY storage engine can be a valuable tool when you’re dealing with temporary data, such as session data. As all data is stored in memory and is faster than disk-based storage, it offers extremely quick access times. However, bear in mind that all data stored with this engine will be lost if the server terminates or crashes.
Answer 3: The ARCHIVE storage engine can be a wise choice when dealing with logging data or any large amount of rarely-referenced data. This engine supports compression, which can save a significant amount of storage space.
Answer 4: When choosing a storage engine for your database, you might consider factors such as:
- The type of operations your database will be mostly handling (READs or WRITEs).
- Whether transaction support and crash safety mechanisms are required.
- The volume of data and the acceptable access/read-write speed.
- Specific features like full-text indexing or GIS capabilities.
中文文章: https://programmerscareer.com/zh-cn/mysql-interview18/
Author: Wesley Wei – Twitter Wesley Wei – Medium
Note: If you choose to repost or use this article, please cite the original source.
Comments